Choice reviews of Lonely Planet: Colombia from Amazon.com

In light of the recent news surrounding Thomas Kohnstamm, contributing author for Lonely Planet’s Colombia, and his fabrication of the guidebook, I decided to weed through the reviews on Amazon and see what people had to say. It wasn’t hard to find a bad one; out 16 total reviews, 14 were given only 1 star. Here are a handful of them:

“I have been a lonely planet guide book fan for many years. Unfortunately, this one is a big disappointment. I doubt the writer spent much time in the country. The info on Medellin is practically non existent. If they even bothered to read wikipedia, they could have provided 100x more info.” — San Diego Guy

“I started in Ipiales, worked my way up to Cartegena and back down to Bogota. There were the usually small errors, but by the time I reached Mompos, I wondered if the authors had visited Colombia recently.” — David Mellinger — Short answer: no!

“This guide does little more than repeat SOME of what the previous guide did. Most likely the writer just checked out phone numbers, maybe eliminated those that did not respond.” — Col

“Go to wikipedia online and you will find out a lot more than reading this book!” — Jack

I wonder if any of the contributing authors actually visited Colombia?

Thomas Kohnstamm wrote the History, Culture, Environment and Food & Drink chapters.

‘Unethical’ Lonely Planet author not really that unethical after all, though he wants us to think so for the sake of promoting his own book

This weekend, news broke of the Lonely Planet writer, Thomas Kohnstamm, who admitted he fabricated portions of his guidebook coverage, and we’ve had several contributers — both Gadling writers and our faithful readers — weighing in with their opinion.

Aaron gave us 5 reasons to be outraged by this news, while Jeff White was doubtful of the legitimacy of guidebooks from the beginning. Matthew Firestone — a guidebook author for Lonely Planet and Gadling contributer — reminds us that not all LP authors are like this.

But it turns out Kohnstamm himself isn’t even like this. His supposed unethical, stick-it-to-the-man, “they didn’t pay me enough to go” actions of not even visiting the country in which he was writing about was a sham, too.

This article from the Guardian suggests that Kohnstamm — in the guidebook publisher’s defense — “was hired to write about the country’s history and not to travel there to review accommodation and restaurants.”

Just another example of Kohnstamm blowing things out of proportion for the sake of shilling his own book — all at the expense of Lonely Planet, their dedicated staff of writers, and the millions of guidebook readers throughout the world.

“It was expected I would never go to Colombia,” he added.

We have a few other Lonely Planet authors on the Gadling team, so expect to hear from them, too.

Plane ticket screw-ups: Avoid these common mistakes

Last week I posted on a Swedish woman currently doing battle with a UK-based travel agency who screwed-up her name on her plane tickets.

While this case does not appear to be the woman’s fault, travel columnist and blogger Christopher Elliott says that plenty of travelers make the mistake of putting the wrong name on their ticket booking, or at least a name that does not match what is on their passport – like if I book a flight for Jeff White, despite my passport saying ‘Jeffrey’.

That mistake tops his list of the five most common ticket errors travelers make. The others:

  • Booking on the wrong airline
  • Reversing departure point and destination
  • Getting the dates of travel wrong
  • Choosing a ticket that is too restrictive

As always, Elliott provides practical advice about how to avoid these simple mistakes, which turn out to be anything but simple to fix after you’ve made them.

King unveils largest cultural center built in Norway in 700 years

Is Norway planning to surpass Australia as the country with the “coolest opera building on the water”? Could be.

Norway’s King Harald V has just opened a $835 million white marble Opera House on the shore of the Oslo Fjord in the heart of the capital, BBC reports. From the outside, the most striking feature is the sloping stone roof, made up of 36,000 fitted pieces, which seems to rise from the water of the fjord.

The Norwegian parliament’s decision to approve its construction in 1999 ended more than 120 years of debate and waiting for a national opera house. The opera house is the largest cultural center built in Norway in 700 years.

Well, it is not exactly as photogenic as the Sydney Opera House, but maybe the photo doesn’t do it justice.