Virgin America moves in on Boston

Remember yesterday when we told you that Virgin America was throwing in the towel at making Chicago their next destination? Not a couple hours after our post went live the ladies at over at VX issued the formal press release: BOSTON will be the next city that the airline opens service to.

Commencing on February 12th of next year, flights will serve Los Angeles three times daily, San Francisco twice and cities in the Midwest zero times.

Boston‘s Logan airport, which appears to be more interested in generating competition than Chicago’s O’hare, is a main hub for American Airlines, US Airways, Jetblue and Delta, so you can imagine that routes on those carrier to the west coast will now super competitive and yes, cheaper. And that’s great news for east and west coasters alike.

We hope to see you in the Midwest soon, Virgin America.

Photo of the Day (12.08.08)


I positively love this image by Flickr user t3mujin — the composition couldn’t be more perfect. Shot in Portugual, the pop of colour is breathtaking, and I love the juxtaposition of the old (the building, the cobblestone street) with the modern (the fire-engine red scooter). Really great shot.

If you’ve got some great travel shots you’d love to share, be sure to upload them to the Gadling pool on Flickr. We might just pick one as our Photo of the Day.

Sleeping Chinese shares hysterical non-action shots

Everyone has their own idea of what makes the perfect photograph. For some, it’s a city skyline at the magic hour. For others, it’s a field of flowers stretching towards the horizon. And for one German expat living in Shanghai, it’s candid shots of Chinese citizens sleeping in public.

Sleeping Chinese is the brainchild of a German who simply goes by “Bernd.” While in China, he has snapped photos of Chinese people sleeping on benches, rocks, shopping carts and under trucks. The site has gained such popularity and the gallery has grown so large (700+ photos), that Bernd has invited visitors to the site to submit their own photos of “sleeping Chinese.”

I, for one, am all for silly photo projects like this. When you travel, how many shots of building exteriors and famous statues do you need? You can find those types of photos in books, magazines, websites and postcards. The best pictures capture quirky moments in time that no other person could replicate. Those moments are unique to you. And if your moment happens to include a sleeping Chinese citizen, then here’s to you!

Before you go thinking that sleeping in public is only popular in China, rest assured that you can find it just about anywhere. I happened upon these tuckered out Japanese folks at a Mos burger in Tokyo earlier this year.

Protesters disrupt service at Stansted Airport

50 protesters from the environmentalist group Plane Stupid forced England’s Stansted Airport to close this morning after they cut their way through security fences and chained themselves to railings and fences near the runway. The airport is heavily used by budget carrier Ryanair, which had to cancel more than 50 flights as a result of the demonstration. The protest began at three in the morning and it was not until 8:30 a.m. that flights resumed.

Ryanair complained about the slow response from security officials:

“It is unacceptable that the travel plans of thousands of passengers have been disrupted because BAA Stansted security have failed to remove a number of protesters.”

Plane Stupid‘s protest was in response to the government’s decision to add another runway to the airport. They have spoken out against the airline industry’s handling of carbon emissions and pollution. I’m no PR expert, but chaining yourself near an airport runway is probably not the best way to get your point across. In fact, I’d way it was plain stupid.

[Related Story]

Plane Answers: Tapping into ATC communications, tracking aircraft and a 60 second takeoff rule?

Welcome to Gadling’s feature, Plane Answers, where our resident airline pilot, Kent Wien, answers your questions about everything from takeoff to touchdown and beyond. Have a question of your own? Ask away!

Ronald asks:

Is there a site where you can listen to aircraft during approach and take off, and what is the site that the news media uses to show air traffic over the US?

Hi Ron,

Take a listen to the live audio feeds that LiveATC.net provides. Many of the controllers at New York’s JFK airport enjoy a large following because of this great service.

For real-time depictions of traffic, FlightAware.com is an amazing site that lets you view all the flights currently over the U.S. and Canada by city, airline, aircraft type or “N” number. Combine this with LiveATC and you’ve got a great view of what’s involved in getting around the country from a pilot or a controllers perspective.

If you’d like to listen to Air Traffic Control on your next flight, read on:
Tim asks:

On two recent flights on United, one of which was delayed in LGA for 3 hours due to weather, the pilot turned on the ATC station on one of the radio stations so we can listen. Two of the best flights of my life. I was up all night (was LGA-SFO) listening to ATC talk to our pilots as well as all the other pilots. What are the rules with this?

This is a unique service offered by United and their pilots on ‘channel nine’ of their inflight audio. I’m not aware of any other domestic carrier that offers this feature to passengers. You may not always hear it on every United flight either, because it’s entirely up to the pilots whether or not they turn it on. A visit to the cockpit to ask if there would be any way they could turn on the channel 9 audio for you might be helpful.

If you do enjoy this service, then please don’t critique the pilots on their radio work while you’re getting off the airplane. You wouldn’t want to encourage them to turn off the audio, now, would you? Give them a big thanks and let’s hope the feature spreads to other carriers. I know I wish we offered this at my airline.

Tim adds a second question:

What do the lights on the end of the wing indicate? I see red, green and others.

Those are navigation lights, just as you’ll see on a boat. Left is red, right is green and the tail light is white. They don’t flash, and they’re mainly to tell if an airplane is coming toward you or going away. The airplane also has white strobe lights, usually on the wing-tips and a red ‘anti-collision’ light on the top and bottom of the fuselage.

For landing, we have landing lights that illuminate the runway, turn-off lights for lighting up a taxiway during a turn as well as a taxi light, which is usually on the nosewheel strut and is used for taxiing of course.

Geoff asks:

I have heard that if a plane (irrespective of whether it is a small plane or a large one) does NOT takeoff within 60 seconds of starting it’s takeoff run it will NOT takeoff at all.

Well, Geoff, now you have me timing all of the takeoffs I’ve made this past week. Most have been in the 35 to 40 second range in the 757, which is an overpowered airplane. But this video of an Illyushun 76 shows just how long a takeoff roll can last. And another video taken from the passenger seat of an Airbus A340 might give you an idea of how it feels to be on such a long (54 second) takeoff run.

But I’ve never heard of a time limit for takeoff. I do remember that when flying a three-engined 727 on a two-engine ferry flight (without passengers), there was a requirement to reach 100 knots in the first 30 seconds or the takeoff would have to be discontinued.

And Geoff follows up:

I also have a question about the different flight levels that ATC gives out for an IFR flight. When ATC initially gives a plane its flight level it seems to be anywhere from a low altitude to a somewhat higher altitude. Are they made because that is the point where ATC will change to another station or are they given to allow for a more efficient use of gravity to speed up or slow down a plane? They often seem like arbitrary numbers however I’m sure there is a reason for them.

You’re close, Geoff. ATC does have different sectors, such as the low altitude center which extends to FL230 (23,000 feet). So pilots are often cleared initially to FL230, but they usually won’t have to level off at that altitude, since ATC will hand them off to a high altitude center controller who can clear the flight to a higher flight level in their area.

Leveling off before reaching the optimum cruise altitude costs fuel, so controllers try their best to give ‘unrestricted’ climbs if they can, traffic permitting.

Once the airplane is at its most efficient altitude, it will stay there until it burns off enough fuel to step up to the next most efficient altitude. These flight levels are usually even-numbered altitudes when traveling west, such as FL320, 340, 360 or odd when flying east. But ATC may assign a different altitude than planned, and it can be at a ‘wrong way’ altitude for a time if traffic warrants.

Do you have a question about something related to the pointy end of an airplane? Ask Kent and maybe he’ll use it for next Monday’s Plane Answers