Hyatt hotels in Boston outsource housekeepers in a dirty deal

Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Connie Schultz is a bit disgusted with three Hyatt hotels in the Boston area. As she wrote in her column in Sunday’s The Plain Dealer, the management of these hotels recently had longtime housekeepers train a fresh crop of housekeepers who had been imported from Georgia.

The longtime housekeepers, one who had been with the company for 22 years, thought they were training staff to fill in for vacation leave hours. They thought this because that’s what management told them.

Boy, were those housekeepers duped. They were let go as soon as the new employees were trained. In all, 100 workers were given the heave ho. Those who were brought up from Georgia are cleaning rooms for almost half the salary of the longtime employees, plus they don’t receive benefits. The longtime housekeepers did.

Schultz isn’t the only one who is disgruntled with the management who has tossed out loyalty in the name of the bottom dollar. The mayor of Boston is calling the move “crude business” and hundreds turned out to protest outside the Hyatt Regency Boston last Thursday. This Boston Globe article that outlines the controversy also states that there is talk that people should boycott the Hyatt hotels that practice such dirty business.

Along with not knowing much about fair play, it seems that the management of those Hyatt hotels should consider this: If part of what one pays for at a higher end hotel is great service, cutting corners on salaries of those people who clean drinking glasses and the toilets may not be the best plan. Remember those hotel drinking glass horror stories that came out two years ago?

So is One Laptop Per Child working or not?

Over at the United Nations’ blog UN Dispatch, Allana Shaikh argues that One Laptop Per Child (OLPC), the non-profit program aimed at getting low-cost laptops into the hands of children in the developing world, is largely a failure. According to Shaikh, the problems with the ambitious program are manifold:

  1. Laptop orders took much longer than expected to arrive in the developing world. Thousands of orders simply vanished.
  2. OLPC doesn’t offer training to teachers on how to incorporate the machines into their classrooms. Neither is there any technical support for the laptops.
  3. Although children report liking the laptops, the computers don’t appear to help them learn.
  4. The laptops are supposed to cost $100 each. The price has yet to drop that far.

Read Shaikh’s whole piece here. She also points to a very good article by Philanthropy Action editor-in-chief Timothy Ogden called “Computer Error?” Ogden argues that treating parasitic worm infections in children, a relatively inexpensive undertaking, would improve their classroom achievement much more than new laptops.

Meanwhile, OLPC’s founder Nicholas Negroponte unsurprisingly takes issue with the views expressed above. In the comments to Shaikh’s post, Negroponte tells her:

“I suggest you look more carefully at Uruguay, Peru and Rwanda. In the case of Uruguay, every child has one. That is pretty amazing. Peru is headed there. Rwanda too. In fact, we have moved our learning group (as of early June) to Kigali [Rwanda’s capital] perminently, to be in the field and get the kind of feedback [about whether OLPC improves achievement] you claim we ignore.”

CNN touted the program’s importance in Afghanistan earlier this year.

My take: Low-cost laptops are not a panacea for all that ails the developing world’s educational systems. In fact, without proper tech support and training for teachers, the computers are likely to do more harm than good. However, these problems will be solved sooner or later, and I predict we’ll soon see netbooks (like typical laptops but smaller) that cost less than $75 or even $50.

When the price comes down that far, and when schools have the kind of training they need to transform the laptops from glorified toys into effective learning tools, we could start to see third-world education finally turn the corner.

Gadlinks for Friday 9.18.09


I’m both happy and sad that it’s Friday: happy because this begins my final weekend on the mainland before I head home after two months of travel; sad because I have to say goodbye to my adorable nephew. Every Friday brings something new and exciting, so does the world and so do these interesting reads for this Friday installment of Gadlinks. Enjoy!

  • I love traveling to remote places in the world. Here’s just a sneak peek at a few of Earth’s final frontiers. [via Open Travel]
  • Even grown adults (such as myself) can’t get enough of Harry Potter, so to quench that thirst a bit Universal Studios in Orlando is opening a Harry Potter Theme Park next spring complete with a Hogwarts School, Hog’s Head Pub, and more. Hooray! [via Faster Times]
  • Maybe it’s because my cousins are on a safari of their own that I happened upon this. Check out these 6 ways to see endangered species without endangering them anymore. [via Treehugger]
  • And finally, if you’re brave enough and have the stomach enough, then give these weird foods from around the world a try. [via BootsNAll]

‘Til Monday, have a great weekend!

More Gadlinks HERE.

Why even the environment hates cruises

As if the cramped cabins, lame entertainment, and superficial shore excursions aren’t enough for you to hate cruises, here’s another reason: they’re pretty bad for the environment too.

A new article on Slate, “A Supposedly Green Thing I Might Do Again,” (get it?) details the disturbing amount of damage that cruise ships do to our air and water. From the smokestacks spewing pollutants on top, to the noxious bilge water that is released (usually treated, but not always) below, cruise ships are some of the modern world’s biggest floating polluters.

And don’t forget about the sewage. According to a report from the non-profit advocacy group Oceana, “the average cruise ship with 3,000 passengers and crew generates about 30,000 gallons of human waste and 255,000 gallons of non-sewage gray water every day.” Yet United States law allows cruise ship operators to dump as much raw sewage as they want into the ocean as long as it’s not done within three miles of the U.S coast.

In addition, Oceana reports that cruise operators are permitted to dump ground-up garbage into the ocean as long as they are three miles from shore. Once they’re 11 miles from shore, the cruise ships may even dump garbage that hasn’t been ground up.

Check out more from Oceana on cruise ship pollution here. Nina Shen Rastogi’s full article on Slate is here.

On a more positive note, several months ago Treehugger wrote about 7 Ocean-Friendly Eco Cruises Hitting the High Seas.

Voluntourism in Costa Rica doesn’t have to be expensive

Tropical Adventures is making it pretty easy for travelers to save the world. The company’s new Cultural Encounter Package offers a six-night/seven-day package at a steep discount of 45 percent. The first two nights are at the historic Hotel Don Carlos, with the other four in the Bamboo Cultural Center’s rustic accommodations in the Talmanaca Indigenous Region. The package includes all meals and some snacks, as well as upgraded transfers to all locations.

Once in Costa Rica, you can take advantage of volunteering opportunities at an elementary school, retirement home and indigenous cultural center. Also, a five-hour local farm tour is available, where you’ll get the chance to see exotic and unusual frogs, birds and butterflies, among other animals.

Based on double-occupancy, the trip costs $899, and the package is good through the last day of February next year.