Faux Nuke in the Desert

A
pretty cool story out of the New Mexico desert.
The pyromaniac in me got kind of giddy when reading this.

A group of artists decided to commemorate the first nuclear explosion in history, the one simply known as the “gadget”
by creating an explosion of their own they call the Simnuke. Using six industrial fire-suppression fans, they pumped
400 gallons of a gasoline-and-biodiesel mixture into an apparatus creating a mushroom cloud blast over 300 feet
high.

The author writes that the blast “was so bright that by comparison, the pre-dawn light in the sky appeared entirely
dark. The ground glowed with the reflection of the blast.” Ah, that just gives me shivers. Not that I am unafraid of
the potential dangers of nuclear technology (big in the
news right now), but there is something
about blowing things up like this that stirs something primeval in us. Or at least it does in most guys.

Lonely Planet Guide to Experimental Travel

I consider travel to be the spice of life, the salt, garlic, saffron, curry and habanero pepper of living life properly. How in the world can you live in the world without seeing the world? Life is too amazing, too diverse, too fricken weird to stick yourself in one place and never leave.

But there is a caveat to that statement. And that is that travel can be a pain in the butt. It can also – at times, occasionally, not-too-often, but it does happen – be boring. This is one of travel’s dirty secrets.

Picture this: you’re seeing your 15th cathedral of the day in France, photographed its ornate stained glass windows (pictures you’ll NEVER look at again…besides, they’re totally blurry!), you’ve tried your best to act interested in the local guide’s unintelligible riff on 16th century pre-Gothic architectural theory…and you still have three cathedrals to go…now tell me that you’re not bored out of your mind!

Is there a solution? Sure, don’t go to France. Ha ha! Just kidding. But seriously folks. A new book out by the folks at Lonely Planet want you to consider a new concept: Experimental Travel. What is ET, besides a big-headed alien with a glowing distal phalange (fingertip)…well, ET is a way of heading out in the world and trying to make it a bit more interesting through thoughtful little strategies and games (for lack of a better word) that both keep you entertained and educate you about where you are.

Does that make sense? The concept is the brainchild of Joel Henry, the French founder of the Laboratory of Experimental Tourism (Latourex).

Here’s an example for digital shutterbugs: It’s an activity called Countertourism. The idea is that (per my comment above) we all take endless photos of landmarks we visit. Most often these pictures are flat, dull and of significantly poorer quality than a postcard. Worse, chances are we will never look at them again. But what if the idea was you had to turn your back to the monument you are visiting, and could only take pictures of what you saw then? That’s a pretty neat idea I think. I’ll bet you’d not only find the effort fun at the time, but your pictures would be wildly more original. But maybe not. Maybe you suck as a photographer.

Anyway, I have the book, courtesy of the folks at Lonely Planet and I quite like the concept. On my next trip I am sure I will take some of these ideas and try to make them work. You should too.

Northwest Mountaineering Journal

As I was cruising around the Web checking out Northwest-related outdoors stuff, I stumbled upon a real jewel. The
Northwest Mountaineering Journal is an online, annual
record of mountaineering in the Pacific Northwest whose mission is to documents “the events, people, history and spirit
of climbing and other mountain sports in this region”. It’s published by a
few NW faithful in conjunction with one of the biggest and
best known groups in the region: The Mountaineers.

Sadly, I could only find one issue online, but it is a
really fine piece of work. The articles here cover some of the best
routes in the region, as well as climbing/outdoor
personalities and a bit of
history. I’d love to see them do another issue or
two, but if that doesn’t happen, what they have up is still pretty sweet.

Joe Trek: Skating Around Australia

I pointed to the great new adventure travel site Stellar Magazine a bit ago
because I thought it was really worth a look. One of the things I like most about it are the short, and excellent,
videos on characters like Scot Schmidt.

But there is also a very cool Webumentary
at Stellar that you ought to check out. It is called
Joe Trek and follows the adventures of
inline skater Joe Rehana, a 20-something adventurer who once skated across the United States. His newest adventure
takes him to Australia, where he is attempting to be the first guy to skate around the entire continent of Australia.
Yes, you heard that right. Around Australia. We’re talking about almost 10,000 miles of skating from Sydney to places
like Tennant Creek, Broome, Carnarvon, Perth, Albany, and on and on, with him finishing back in Sydney approximately
ten months later. At Stellar, you can follow his trip reading dispatches, seeing photos and watching the countdown
clock tracking his progress. An excellent Flash interactive also let’s you
follow his progress. This is one worth checking out.

National Parks: The Best and Worst

I have raved here so often about how great our National Park System is in this
country that I sometimes get tired of hearing myself. I apologize for the drumbeat, but if there is one thing we should
be proud of in this country when it comes to government, it is the NPS. That said, there are some parks that rule and
some that suck. Some National Parks or Monuments or whatever, get their designation as a result of pork, because some
Senator or Congressman wants to dedicate the place that taffy was invented as a National Historic Site to please his
constituents.

So as consumers of the National Park System’s goods, to put things in strict economic terms, it is important for us to
know which parks are good and which are not. And that is where
this list by National
Geographic
Traveler comes in handy.  This is serious stuff. They’ve got some of the best folks in the world to
help them rank the parks: scores of park staff, scientists, environmentalists, etc. The
folks who know
what they are talking about. They rank the parks from best to worst not just in terms if whether the park is great or
not, but also according to whether the park is facing pressures from over-visitation, pollution, infrastructure
degradation and so on. Parks
like
the Grand Canyon, Yosemite and Carlsbad Caverns, the list suggests, are being loved to death.

This is an excellent piece that really shed some light for me on what is going on in the parks system, and it could be
used as an excellent guide to help you determine which park to visit for your next vacation.