Washington airport terminal flooded after water main burst

Around 3pm yesterday afternoon, Washington’s Reagan National airport suffered some substantial damage from a burst water main pipe. Passengers arriving at the airport were greeted by several inches of water in the baggage claim area, and by 6pm, most of the airport had been shut down. As you can see in the video above, the amount of water was so great, that it was pouring out of the side of the building.

At the moment, only US Airways flights are being affected, and passengers flying US Airways out of DCA/Regan National are advised to contact the airline for more information. Only terminal C was flooded – terminals A and B were not impacted, and flights out of those terminals should be departing on time today.

More photos of the flooded terminal have been posted over at “We Love DC” and for more on the status of the C terminal, check the site of the airport operator.

Hertz running out of cars in NYC

When the airports shut down, short-haul fliers turn to the rental car kiosks. They’re willing to brave dangerously slick streets to get home, causing a one-way drain for the lots. The rush of bad weather that cut through New York on December 19 and 20, 2009 left parking spaces empty and led to more than a bit of frustration, as Hertz was unable to deliver on rental reservations.

According to an e-mailed statement in Bloomberg News, Richard Broome, a spokesman for the company, said, “We have been moving in cars to Manhattan as fast as possible, but we are playing catch up.” He continued, “The unusually severe storm created a temporary fleet shortage.”

When 10 inches of snow were dropped on New York City, 1,600 flights were canceled. Over the past two years, Hertz has cut its rental car fleet, and it has fallen victim to the travel slump that’s raged around the world. Both factors put pressure on the company’s ability to fulfill. This quarter, however, it began to increase its fleet by 18 percent, because of an increase in demand it had already noted.

BREAKING NEWS: Possible new TSA rules in effect after terror attempt

After yesterdays terrorist bomb attempt on a Northwest Airlines flight, it was only a matter of time until the government came up with new rules designed to “keep us safe”.

Air Canada has published these rules, though the TSA has not officially released them yet, so it remains a possibility that someone jumped the gun.

The new rules a going to be horrible to deal with – passengers will no longer be allowed to get up out of their seat for the final hour of a flight. You will also be prohibited from accessing your carry-on items during this period or from holding any items in your lap.

This is potentially a big one – it means you can’t use your laptop, read a book or magazine, or even grab a toy or bottle of water during the final 60 minutes of your flight. If true – this is a massive inconvenience for all passengers, all based off one terror attempt that should have been prevented if terror watch list measures had been properly followed.

International flights are already suffering from new carry-on measures, and passengers heading to the United States are once again being limited to one item of hand luggage – something implemented and lifted after the Richard Reid bomb attempt. Of course, since the Nigerian bomber had his bomb strapped to his legs, a hand luggage restriction seems rather useless.

In the coming days we’ll most likely hear more from the TSA on these new rules, and whether the “final hour” rule is indeed a new hassle we’ll need to deal with. Obviously, we’ll keep you updated when we hear more. In the meantime – if you are abroad, and plan to fly to the United States, be prepared for long delays and multiple security screenings.

Chalk this up to another win for the terrorists – even though they (thankfully) did not manage to blow anything up, they will once again forever change the way we travel.

UPDATE: We’re hearing rumors that electronics are being banned from international flights traveling to the U.S., and that passengers flying into the US are limited to one handheld bag per person.

UPDATE 2: For those wondering how Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab got past security, the explosive device apparently had no metal parts, and the individual pieces were sewn into Abdulmutallab’s underwear.

UPDATE 3: According to a memo from the TSA to US Airways, the TSA has ordered airlines to perform a “pat-down” screening of all passengers on inbound international flights, “concentrating on upper legs and torso.” Chris Elliott has the full text of the memo outlining the new security measures.

UPDATE 4: Inflight entertainment has been banned on all international flights.

UPDATE 5
: Police take into custody a second person after report of suspicious activity on Delta/Northwest flight 253 from Amsterdam, only two days after the Abdulmutallab incident.

UPDATE 6
: The “suspicious activity” by the second person, also a Nigerian, was locking himself inside the airplane’s lav. No actual explosive device was discovered on the flight.

UPDATE 7
: As of December 28 at 8am EST, electronics are still allowed on international flights, despite reports to the contrary. As of this update, the TSA has not updated its website with anything more specific than,

Passengers flying into the United States from abroad can expect to see additional security measures at international airports such as increased gate screening including pat-downs and bag searches. During flight, passengers will be asked to follow flight crew instructions, such as stowing personal items, turning off electronic equipment and remaining seated during certain portions of the flight.

UPDATE 8: It looks as though the new international flight rules will be in effect through December 30, 2009. It’s unclear at this time if they’ll remain in effect into 2010.

UPDATE 9
: Two passengers, “described as Middle Eastern, [who] were acting strangely and talking loudly to each other in a foreign language” were detained yesterday after a flight from Orlando to Phoenix. Questioning and a search of their belongings turned up nothing suspicious, and the men were released.

UPDATE 10: Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano admitted this morning that airline security failed in allowing a Nigerian on a terror watch list and allegedly armed with explosives onto a Detroit-bound flight. This comes only 24 hours after her insistence previously that “the system worked.”

UPDATE 11
: Our inside source in the industry now reports that inflight entertainment has been restored as well as the ability to move about the cabin inside of an hour to landing.

Amsterdam Schiphol airport in damage control mode after terror attempt

If you want a surefire way to have the international aviation community look down on your airport, all you need to do is make the news as “the airport” where a terror attempt originated.

Amsterdam Schiphol is the airport where yesterdays trouble may have started. I’m of course talking about the attempt at blowing up a Northwest Airlines/Delta Airlines plane bound for Detroit.

The Nigerian passenger started his trip in Lagos, but transited in Amsterdam, and that part of his trip is at the core of political question time in The Netherlands.

According to airport security officials, he probably arrived at Schiphol with the explosives already strapped to his legs, but current screening technology at the airport can’t detect non-metallic objects. European airports have been asking for full body scanners for several years, but the European Commission is blocking their implementation because of privacy concerns.

Assuming Schiphol acted correctly, and screened the passenger as demanded by the United States, the airport can’t be blamed for allowing the passenger to board. Part of the screening procedure is a “fly/no fly” permission system, and according to the airline, the United States greenlighted the Nigerian terrorist to fly to the States – even though he was on an international watch list.

If you are flying from Amsterdam to the United States, you’ll need to be prepared for long delays, as all US bound planes are undergoing enhanced screening procedures.

TSA snags child’s Christmas present: Think like TSA when packing your carry on

Think like TSA when you pack your Christmas presents for your flight home. If you don’t think like TSA, your child may end up losing a gift. It almost happened to us.

In the past, I have said goodbye to a full bottle of suntan lotion and a corkscrew with a knife attached. Those were not fun to lose, but these were items that ended up in our carry on bag as we hurried. I’ve known about snow globes for awhile so I never would forget about one of those.

Still, to not be like me, don’t pack in a hurry. Sift through that carry on bag one more time. Don’t think logically; think like TSA. Items that may seem harmless to you can cause TSA’s warning bells to ring. This summer, as Scott posted, one boy lost a Star Wars toy from Disneyland at a security checkpoint.

In general, when it comes to TSA’s warning bells, I’m not one to argue, but when it came to one of my son’s Christmas presents, I went head to head with Mr. TSA Man. I tried to stay polite even though I was mad enough I could have spit.

Here’s how it went down and who won. Will a certain present be under the tree this year?

As a last minute shopping trip the day we flew out of the airport in Albuquerque, New Mexico this summer, I headed to the Indian Pueblo Cultural Center and my favorite gift shop. There, among other things, I bought a hand-painted, flimsy bow and arrow set for my son for a Christmas present.

Because both could be easily snapped in two–the arrow was more of a stick really with merely a suggestion of a tip, I decided to keep the set in the shopping bag and use the bag as a carry on. I had “toy” on the brain. I did not have my TSA thinking cap turned on.

As soon as Mr. TSA saw the bow and arrow through the monitor of the X-ray machine, he saw weapon. Of course he would. He’s TSA Man.

TSA Man pulled the bow and arrow out of the bag.

“It’s a child’s toy.” I tried to be reasonable in my tone.

TSA Man said, “It’s a bow and arrow.”

By this time the bow and arrow was on the counter in plain sight. My son looked happy to see it. “Is that for me?” he said. There went a Christmas surprise.

“Could you remove the arrow so we could take the bow?” I asked TSA man, thinking this might be a solution to keep us both satisfied. I really liked the bow.

“No,” said TSA man.

“Why not?” By this time, TSA man was really getting on my nerves. I was trying to be helpful. He didn’t seem to care that he ruined a perfectly good Christmas present that I wouldn’t find anywhere else.

TSA Man: “Because it’s a bow and arrow.”

At this point, I may have said “That’s dumb.” I did say, “If you take off the arrow, wouldn’t it be just a bow?”

“No,” he said. “It’s still a bow and arrow.”

Recognizing the futility of the power of logic, I said, “Then I’ll check it.”

I had a carry on that the set would fit in and I’m stubborn.

I reached for the bow and arrow.

TSA Man: “You can’t touch it. I have to carry it.”

“Fine.”

I waltzed toward the terminal door that lead out of security with my carry on and with TSA Man following close behind. He handed me the child’s bow and arrow once I was on the main terminal side of the door.

Ever polite, I did say “Thanks,” although by this time I did not sound pleasant.

The bow and arrow set made it home safely. Checking it last minute cost $15 dollars–twice as much as I paid for it. Oh, but keeping that bow and arrow set was so worth it.

This is a lesson in having a carry-on you can check if need be and enough time before your flight to do a last minute check in.

By the way, there were three wooden tomahawk toys in the shopping bag as well. I guess tomahawks aren’t weapons.

The bow and arrow set is not going under the Christmas tree. My son already has it.

When you are packing, remember to think, what would TSA man think about this? If you’re not sure, check out this list of prohibited items from the TSA website. Also, here’s the information about traveling with food and gifts.