Apparently you can’t strip in airports

by Mike Barish on

You’re late for a flight. Your clothes are wet and filthy. You have a change of clothes with you in the airport. What do you do? If you said, “find the closest restroom and put on your fresh duds,” then you are well on your way to staying out of jail in Salvador, Brazil.

It seems that two German tourists decided to just strip down and change their clothes in the middle of the Salvador airport. The two travelers said that they thought it “was normal” to change clothes like that in Brazil. Because it’s always Carnaval in Brazil, even at the airports.

Surely they must have had a good reason for attempting to get out of their clothes so urgently. Well, “one of them got wet during a boat trip and the other felt sick and vomited during the same trip earlier in the day.” Wait. He didn’t think to change his clothes immediately after vomiting? Did he spend the rest of the day in the vomit-covered shirt and only think to change when he got to the airport? How chunky was the vomit?

They have been charged with obscenity and could face up to a year in prison, where stripping down will have even worse repercussions.

No word yet on whether they continued to wear their German uniform of wool socks with sandals.

[Via Sydney Morning Herald]

Heathrow gets go ahead for third runway – Greenpeace not happy

by Scott Carmichael on

London Heathrow airport is in desperate need of a third runway.

Despite being one of the busiest airports in the world, all 481,000 yearly aircraft movements take place on just 2 runways.

Anyone who has arrived or departed from Heathrow has probably spent a decent chunk of time waiting in line for a take off slot, or received a complimentary 45 minute sightseeing trip making circles over London waiting for permission to land.

The UK government has been working on a proposal for a third runway for years, and finally agreed to grant building permission for it yesterday.

Of course, nothing airport related ever goes without some major opposition, and this one is no different.

Greenpeace is so strongly opposed to the expansion plans, that they purchased a chunk of land right in the village of Sipson. Sipson is one of the communities destined to become extinct when construction on the runway begins.

Their plan is to break the land up into smaller chunks, and sell it to as many people as possible, making it harder for the government to claim ownership.

Greenpeace argues that the third runway is not necessary, and they have a long list of reasons for being against this expansion.

Of course, environmental clubs like Greenpeace have a long history in trying to prevent new runways from being built, but very little history in actually stopping the construction.

A similar situation happened in the Netherlands in the mid 90’s when a local environmental protection club purchased a small plot of land just outside Schiphol airport and planted it full of trees. It delayed things a bit, but the runway was still built.

At the end of the day these actions just cost massive amounts of taxpayer money and clog up our legal systems, but it’s a noble cause and I don’t think anyone denies Greenpeace a little publicity stunt.

Proposal for new San Diego airport draws criticism, laughter

by Scott Carmichael on

For years, San Diego has been working hard to find a new location for its single runway Lindbergh airport.

Back in 2003, a group of investors announced that they had found the perfect location, but would not reveal it until the government granted a patent for the concept.

The patent was granted 2 weeks ago, which meant it was time to reveal the location of this super secret airport – turns out the group wants the new airport built in the San Diego bay.

“Crackpot stuff” is the initial reaction from a former state Senator, “a complete nonstarter” is how a spokeswoman from the environmental health coalition describes it.

The plan calls for a 3-runway island with a heliport, cruise terminal, ferry facility and the potential for military co-use. Passengers to the airport would reach the island through an underwater tunnel.

The site is right on the edge of a large wildlife refuge and several other environmentally sensitive pieces of land.

So far, the location has already been declined by the airport authority who claim the FAA would never allow a north-south runway due to wind conditions. The business group behind the plans claimed they had the FAA’s blessing, but the FAA later denied giving such a blessing.

I’m not entirely sure why the proposal required a patent, man made island airports are certainly not new, Hong Kong opened Chek Lap Kok airport on an island in 1998, and Japan built its new Kansai airport on similar ground in 1994. Of course, each of those airports cost $20 Billion to construct, and I have a hard time imagining the US finding that kind of cash for a new airport any time soon.

(Via: SignOn San Diego)

MSP has a fun game on Concourse F

by Annie Scott on


Traveling through MSP over the holidays, I came across a bunch of kids going nuts in the hall on the way from security to Concourse F. Kids usually know what’s fun, so I stopped to see what they were doing.

There was a series of moving posters on the wall, like the one you see above. All looked like red umbrellas, but when the kids touched them, the pieces of the umbrella would scatter like dry leaves. Naturally, kids had their coats off and were circling them overhead, whooping the poster panels cowboy-style.

The neatest thing was, if you touched just the bottom of the umbrella, or just the middle, only that part would break apart. The motion sensors integrated in the projection were that specific!

The whole thing is an advertisement for Travelers Insurance (note the red umbrella logo). Click through the gallery to watch the kids play, and next time you have an MSP layover, go check it out on Concourse F!
%Gallery-40840%

Do not be scared about the burning 747 at Schiphol airport

by Scott Carmichael on

Imagine arriving at your Amsterdam airport hotel room and the first thing you see out the window is a burning Jumbo with a bunch of crash tenders on the runway.

It took me about 10 seconds to remember passing the “jet’ when we taxied to the terminal, and realizing that it wasn’t actually a real plane, but the practice jet for the airport fire department.

Jerry wrote about these practice runs back in November of last year, but I can’t help wonder how many people see the outline of a burning 747 and freak out. It certainly isn’t the kind of thing I’d like to see on my final approach to the airport and the proximity to the main terminal is quite scary.