The Sounds of Travel 6: “Oh My Sweet Carolina”

Here at Gadling we’ll be highlighting some of our favorite sounds from the road and giving you a sample of each — maybe you’ll find the same inspiration that we did, but at the very least, hopefully you’ll think that they’re good songs.

Got a favorite of your own? Leave it in the Comments and we’ll post it at the end of the series.

“Oh My Sweet Carolina” by Ryan Adams

Nick Hornby, a favorite author of mine, first tipped me off to this amazing Ryan Adams song in this essay on the McSweeney’s website. “Oh My Sweet Carolina,” which Hornby describes as “so quiet that you don’t want to breathe throughout its duration,” might seem to be an odd choice for a series celebrating great travel songs. After all, it’s about the unfulfilling, disappointing journeys– to Vegas, Cleveland, San Antonio– that we take because we’re looking for something that we can’t find at home:

Oh my sweet Carolina
What compels me to go
Oh my sweet disposition
May you one day carry me home

This is a lesson many travelers, including myself, have had to learn first-hand: that travel is not a panacea for all your problems. Running away from life is only a quick, temporary fix, and sooner or later everything you fear must be faced head-on.

Another thing the song addresses is this: once we’ve been away from our friends and family for a while, sometimes home starts to look, well, not so bad. In his Pulitzer-prize winning novel American Pastoral, Philip Roth writes that when people die, their imperfections tend to disappear, or even to become appealing: “This can happen when people die– the argument with them drops away and people so flawed while they were drawing breath that at times they were all but unbearable now assert themselves in the most appealing way, and what was least to your liking the day before yesterday becomes in the limousine behind the hearse a cause not only for sympathetic amusement but for admiration.”

In my experience, the same transformation happens to your hometown and your friends and family when you’ve been away for a while.

Lyrics here; awesome Elton John cover here; Nick Hornby essay here. Listen to the song, it’s good.

Through the Gadling Lens: apertures and shutters and ISOs, oh my!

So, so far, we’ve discussed two things: how to pick a camera and what kind of lenses you might want to take with you on your trip. Today, I thought we’d talk about the exciting world of apertures, and shutter speeds and ISO.

Wait, where are you going?

Okay, I know that for a majority of you, you couldn’t care less about these sorts of things — you’d rather just pick up your camera, set it on automatic, and go. And I promise, going forward, we’re going to talk about less dry subjects, like shooting techniques and using Photoshop and the like. But the truth is, understanding ISOs and apertures and shutter speeds can help give you a lot of power over your resulting shots. So trust me on this: it’ll be worth it, even though the sketches that follow are a travesty to art.
So, basically, your camera, regardless of brand, whether it’s a point-and-shoot or SLR, or how simple or complicated it is, works like this: light comes into your lens, and passes through an aperture, then through a shutter before it finally hits the film (or digital sensor and storage media), and then it magically turns into a photograph. Obviously, there’s a lot more physics to it than that, but dude, I’m not a physics major, and believing that it’s “magic” is a lot more interesting, so go with me on this.

Graphically speaking, and viewing your camera from the side, it looks somewhat like this:

Now, I could try to draw exactly what each of those items actually looks like, but as you’ve probably guessed by now, sketching isn’t my strong suit. Nonetheless, it turns out that you really don’t need to know what they look like, but it’s sort of important to understand what they do. And to help illustrate what they do, take a look at this image:

I know this looks kind of crazy, but stay with me:

Your aperture acts sort of like a curtain: it decides how much light in total you want going into your camera.

Your shutter acts like a door that quickly opens and shuts, limiting the amount of actual light that gets to the film/digital sensor, regardless of the total amount the aperture actually let into the camera in the first place. Think of it this way: remember, back in the day when you had a film camera, the biggest catastrophe that could occur on your vacation was that the back of your camera would open up, and all that light would get in and ruin the film, rendering all those great images of you doing tequila shots in Tijuana completely useless? That’s because too much light overexposes the image. The shutter opens and shuts really quickly, so that only the right amount of light gets in, and the image is correctly exposed.

And finally, the film (or digital sensor/memory card) captures the remaining light and uses magic to turn it into a photograph.

Now, the very cool thing about your camera (and what you may not have realized if you’ve just been shooting on automatic this entire time) is that in many cases, it allows you to control each of the aperture, shutter speed, and film/digital sensor capacity. It’s almost like there are tiny little people living in your camera, just waiting for your command:

At the risk of your believing that I’ve finally lost it, I’ll press on.

APERTURE

As I mentioned above, the aperture helps control how much total light goes into the camera. Now, if you’ve ever heard the term “f-stop” or seen weird numbers like “f/1.4” or “f/16” on your camera or next to an image online, those terms are referring to how open or closed the aperture (or in our case, the “curtain”) is, and therefore how much light is going into the camera. There are, of course, mathematical reasons for the number designations, but really, knowing that isn’t necessary. Here’s the only thing you need to remember:

If the aperture number (f-stop number) is large, then when you take a picture, you’ll have more detail in the background of your image (i.e., your background will be more detailed, a “large depth of field“).

If the aperture number (f-stop number) is small, then when you take a picture, you’ll have less detail in the depth of your image (i.e., your background will be less detailed, a “small depth of field“).

Some practical examples might help.

Say you’re taking a vacation in the American heartland, for the express purpose of capturing an image of those “amber waves of grain.” Or, perhaps instead, you’re in Houston, in my overgrown front garden. Here are a couple of images that you might get, when playing with the aperture on your camera:

I shot the image above at f/16, which is sort of a large aperture number. Notice how you can make out the detail of each of the little slats in the black shutters in the background, and the foliage in front is just a jumble of branches. Everything, pretty much, is in focus, or you would say that this image has a “large depth of field.”

Now contrast the above with the following image:

This image was shot at f/4.2, which is, in comparison to the above, a small aperture number — the lens is the same, I’m standing in the same spot, and I took the image at the same time of day. In this image, you can no longer really make out the detail of the black shutters, and in fact, the only thing in focus is the branch at the very front. Everything else is out of focus, and therefore this image has a “small depth of field.”

Does this sort of make sense? Therefore and ergo, going back to your vacation in the American heartland, back to those amber fields of grain, before you take the photograph, you can think to yourself, “Self, do I want to show how vast the amount of grain is in this field, and therefore use a high aperture setting, so that all of the grain is in focus? Or, Self, would I rather just focus on this one golden reed of grain, and blur all the others in the background, so I should use a small aperture setting?” Then you’d set your aperture, you’d aim, and you’d shoot. No Photoshop required.

SHUTTER

Remember, this is the part of the camera that acts like a door, opening and closing quickly, to moderate the amount of light that actually gets to the film/digi
tal sensor at the back of the camera
, and thus creating the best exposure. I will be honest with you — I rarely, if ever, try to control the shutter speed of my camera. I’m far more likely to mess with my aperture settings (the “curtain guy”) to control my depth of field (how blurry I want my background to be, described above), or my ISO setting (the “light catchers,” which will be discussed below), and let the camera figure out which shutter speed would be most appropriate. That said, there’s one application where you might want to play with your shutter speed setting, and that’s to control movement.

Here’s what I mean: you’ll find shutter controls described in seconds, or fractions of a second, otherwise known as “exposure time.” With a long exposure time, the shutter will be open longer, and movement will look more blurry. With a shorter exposure time, the shutter will be open for a shorter time, and movement will look frozen in time.

For example, this shot …

… was taken at a shutter speed of 1/160th of a second — notice how the water looks like it’s rushing over the rocks. There’s movement, it conveys what it felt and sounded like to be there on that beach in Cozumel, Mexico.

But in this picture …

… the shutter speed was at 1/250th of a second — much faster, making the water coming out of my backyard hose look frozen, and therefore more refreshing on a hot summer day.

ISO

Remember back in the day when you were buying film, the box of film would have numbers on it like “100” or “400” or “1000”? That was the film’s ISO number. ISO stands for “International Organization for Standardization ” (I know that mixes up the initials, but I didn’t come up with acronym, so don’t blame me), and basically the ISO number has to do with the sensitivity of the film to light. Nowadays, with digital cameras, there are still ISO settings, and understanding how they work can help improve your images. To help me remember what the numbers mean, I like to think as the ISO number as the “number of light catchers” the camera needs to use:

In other words, remember this:

The lower the ISO number, the fewer light catchers you’ll be using to catch the light. Low ISOs work better in bright sunlight — no flash necessary.

The higher the ISO number, the more light catchers you’ll be using the catch the light. High ISOs work in overcast or low light — and again, no flash will be necessary.

For example — see that photograph of my garden hose, above? That was taking at an ISO setting of 200 — because it was taken in the middle of a hot summer day, there was TONS of available light. So I knew I only needed 200 light catchers to catch the light when the shutter (“door”) was open to let the light in. Contrast this with the following shot I took of my husband this past weekend:

This was taken just as the sun was dipping below the horizon. The light was low, so I knew I needed to employ as many light catchers as I could to grab any and all available light: this was shot at an ISO setting of 3200.

And finally, compare the above shot with this one:

This shot was taking at the same time, but this time the setting was at ISO 500. See how completely blurry and out of focus Marcus is? That’s because when I decided to shoot at 500, the Door-Opening Guy (the automatic shutter control) went, “SERIOUSLY? FIVE HUNDRED? In *this* nonexistent light? That’s so not enough Light Catchers. I’m going to have to keep the door open longer to let more light in, and expose the photograph properly.” So he did — the shutter was open for 2.5 seconds. The problem is that when the shutter is open for that long, the slightest movement — my hand holding the camera dipping ever slow slightly — causes blur in the resulting image.

Given all of this, it sounds like you’d never need a flash again, right? Just crank up that ISO setting, and bam! No flash needed! Well, not quite: the problem with using high ISOs is that while you might get the image you want, the image tends to be grainier then at low ISO settings (contrast the quality of the first image of Marcus with the image of the hose, above). So if you’re looking for a nice sharp image in low light, you might want to either (a) use a flash or (b) use a tripod with a low ISO setting — that way the camera (“Door-Opening Guy”) can keep the shutter open as long as necessary, without worrying about camera shake.

So that’s it — you’re now an expert (sort of) on apertures, shutters, and ISOs! Better still, that’s pretty much as technical as we’re going to get about the workings of your camera here at Through the Gadling Lens, so never fear. As it happens, I’m leaving at the end of this week for a two-week holiday to England, so for upcoming posts I’ll talk about planning for a trip, and executing photo shoot days. In the meantime, keep clicking those cameras!

Karen is a writer and photographer in Houston, Texas. You can see more of her work at her site, Chookooloonks.
And for more Through the Gadling Lens, click here.

Tuesday Travel Trivia (Week 3)

It’s once again time for your weekly dose of Travel Trivia. Answer these ten questions in the Comments, and come back next week to find out if you were right. And, hey, no cheating– that means no looking at maps, no Googling, no phoning-a-friend. There’s no prize for the winner (‘cept tons of respect), so don’t be that guy. As my third-grade teacher used to say, you’re only cheating yourselves.

By the way, congrats to last week’s winners Amy, Stolen, and our own Willy Volk.

Without further ado, the questions.

  1. Of the eleven countries whose name begins with A, all but two of them also end with A. Which two don’t end with A?
  2. Who wrote the award-winning 1975 travelogue The Great Railway Bazaar?
  3. Name the African country whose flag is a solid green rectangle.
  4. Remember Sarah Palin? For what small Alaskan town did she serve as mayor from 1996-2002?
  5. What “hip, vibrant” online travel community features a Bounty Board full of assignments for aspiring travel writers and recently acquired the site Brave New Traveler?
  6. What is the official name of North Korea?
  7. In which South American country are the Nazca Lines (seen above) located?
  8. Which country’s residents spent the most on international travel during 2007?
  9. According to Forbes Traveler, what US tourist destination was the most visited spot in the world in 2007?
  10. What US territory is the only one larger than a US state?

Look below the fold for last week’s answers.

  1. What famous TV travel host is the editor of the 2008 edition of The Best American Travel Writing? Anthony Bourdain
  2. Which African nation was forced to print a series of 10-million dollar bills earlier this year to combat rampant hyper-inflation? Zimbabwe
  3. Name the famous American author who once wrote, “Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness.” Mark Twain
  4. Angel Falls is the world’s highest waterfall at over 3,200 feet. In which South American country is it located? Venezuela
  5. Which of the first five US presidents does not have a capital city named for him? John Adams (Liberia’s capital, Monrovia, was named for President James Monroe)
  6. Who told Colbert Report host Stephen Colbert that he had named one of his aircrafts “Air Colbert”? Richard Branson
  7. What is the name of the type of projection used in the map above? Mercator projection
  8. What’s the name of the enclave-country that is located entirely within South Africa’s borders? Lesotho
  9. In what states (or countries) were Barack Obama and John McCain born? Obama – Hawaii; McCain – the Canal Zone (now Panama)
  10. Which of these countries is often not considered a part of Scandinavia: Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark? Finland

Plane Answers: Single-engine taxi, engine-out flight and ATC confusion

Welcome to Gadling’s feature, Plane Answers, where our resident airline pilot, Kent Wien, answers your questions about everything from takeoff to touchdown and beyond. Have a question of your own? Ask away!

Julie asks:

Recently on a short flight on a de Havilland Dash 8, I noticed as we were taxiing down the runway that only one of the props was spinning, and the other one appeared to be off. I have seen this on other flights with the same type of plane, and the first time I ever noticed it I almost thought they had forgotten to turn it on (which is really, really silly I know)!

I know you don’t fly this kind of aircraft, but I thought you might have an answer anyway. I can’t really ever see into a jet engine to tell if it is spinning during taxi, so I guess it is possible that this is something regular with all twin engine aircraft and I just never knew it? Thanks Kent!

HI Julie,

I used to fly the Dash 8’s little brother, the Twin Otter. Even then, when fuel was less expensive than today, we would taxi on one engine as often as possible to save fuel.

Jets do this rather frequently too, but as you said, it’s rather difficult to tell from a distance.

There are limitations, however. We can’t taxi on one engine when we’re too heavy or when we may have to climb a bit of a hill on a taxiway, or if the taxiway may be slippery due to snow or slush. Also, on some aircraft, we need to be sure that we can give a 2 to 3 minute ‘warm-up’ time for the shutdown engine before we take off. So short taxis usually are accomplished with two engines.
John asks:

On a recent A340-500 flight the right engine sounded as if it had trouble. The flight deck crew left the side light on for about two hours and then turned them on every 2 hours after that (this flight was from JNB to ZUR). I was just wondering if we really did have a problem. We have been on many A-340 flights and have not noticed any engine noise.

Can the A-340 fly on 3 engines?

It’s hard to know if there was a problem on your flight, but you can be assured that if there were any indication of an engine issue, such as high vibration, oil loss or over-temperature, the crew would have shut the engine down.

All airliners are certified to fly with at least 50% of their power lost. So on an A340, that means any two engines could have been shut down and the airplane would still fly. They might have had to descend to a lower altitude, but they could still stay in the air.

The light you saw was a wing inspection light, used mainly to see if any ice was building up on the leading edge of the wing. It’s also used, along with all the other lights on the airplane, as an enhancement to the “see and be seen” philosophy when in the vicinity of the airport while on approach.

I’ve ridden in the back of a 737 while pilots were taking their checkrides. One engine was pulled to idle throughout much of this training and I was rather surprised to discover just how difficult it was to tell from the passenger cabin when we were flying on one engine.

While it’s never routine to have to shut down an engine in-flight, an engine failure on a four-engine aircraft is far from catastrophic.

Rishi writes:

I was wondering if you could explain to me the following two questions, please. First, why is that when I listen to ATC talk to pilots that one or both of the parties speak reasonably slowly, and understandably, but then, a moment later, they talk so darn quickly and un-intelligibly?

Second, given that ATC talks really fast at times, how do you pilots ever get to understand what they say? I’m quite surprised because I hardly ever get to catch the name of the airlines when the controller speaks so quickly. Please explain how you get used to this. . .

Hi Rishi,

There are times when pilots have to “read back” instructions from ATC. Those read backs are often spoken rather quickly. Complicated instructions that aren’t routine in nature are spoken much more clearly. So if the phrase is something that’s expected, such as a clearance for an approach or landing, clarity often suffers.

For an example, take a listen to www.liveatc.net and click on one of the audio streams of your favorite airport. After a while, you’ll notice the controllers giving nearly the same instructions to each airplane as they clear them for the approach. It might take an understanding of instrument flying to grasp what’s being said, but you’ll get the idea.

My favorite feed is from Caracas, Venezuela. Listen to the Delta and American flights going in there try to comprehend what’s being said, in between all the Spanish that’s spoken to the other aircraft.

Often it’s not the accent that’s so difficult to understand in a foreign country, but it’s the lack of awareness of the phrases used. I remember the first time I heard a French controller rapidly say “I-call-you-back,” instead of the more common, “Standby” that I was used to.

“Wha..?” I asked the captain.

I’ve now heard that phrase so many times, it doesn’t matter how strong the accent may be, I know what they’re saying.

LiveATC is a great resource for anyone who’s learning to fly or who might be working on an instrument rating.

Do you have a question about something related to the pointy end of an airplane? Ask Kent and maybe he’ll use it for next Monday’s Plane Answers feature.

Sounds of Travel 5: One Night in Tokyo

Here at Gadling we’ll be highlighting some of our favorite sounds from the road and giving you a sample of each — maybe you’ll find the same inspiration that we did, but at the very least, hopefully you’ll think that they’re good songs. Got a favorite of your own? Leave it in the comments below and we’ll post it at the end of the series.

WEEK 4: Colder – One Night In Tokyo

Japan has a reputation of creating bewilderment and a sense of wonder for visitors from the Western world. For anyone who has ever gotten lost in the “fiction” of Japan created by movies like Lost in Translation or anime series like Gundam, there is a perception created of a place that looks strangely familiar yet somehow slightly askew, like your friend was hiding around the corner, waiting to jump out and scare the crap out of you. You’re left constantly on edge, ready to be surprised, shocked and amused by a constant barrage of stimuli.

It was with these thoughts in mind as I landed in Tokyo for my first trip to Japan earlier this year. My home base for the next 10 days was a high rise in the Shinjuku neighborhood – a bustling, neon-lit business district in central Tokyo. As I unpacked my things in my room, I flipped on my iPod to a song by Colder, a French electronic artist known for his moody, atmospheric compositions, fittingly selecting one of my favorite tracks called “One Night in Tokyo.”

As the track slowly kicked in, I took in my surroundings. Dusk was beginning to settle over this massive metropolis. Thousands of office towers lay before me – giant monoliths of concrete and glass glistening quietly, silhouetted against the quickly darkening sky. Each pulsated at the top with the intermittent blink of tiny red light, creating a vision of thousands of tiny insects flashing alone in the dark, performing a giant light show for an unknown audience that rushed by, oblivious. The scene was punctuated by the clackety-clack of endless subway cars as they rumbled into the gigantic Shinjuku rail station down below.

“One Night in Tokyo” was the perfect complement to my overwhelming sense of vertigo at the scene before me. The song builds slowly, adding layer upon layer of warm keyboard synths, dub echoes and handclaps, while lead singer Marc Tan sings in a detached, mysterious monotone. The sound effects fade in and out of the song chaotically, much like the intermittent trains that pierced the silence of my quiet hotel room.

As isolating as this all may sound, One Night in Tokyo was absolutely perfect for setting the right Tokyo mood. It captured what I found so intriguing about Tokyo at night – the air feels thick with excitement and potential. The dark alleyways, the searing neon, the bustle and the activity all created a sense of mystery and excitement. There was a constant sense that at any moment I would be thrust into my own movie plot, filled with strange characters and shady villans darting onto subway platforms and down sidestreets.

My next 10 days in Japan presented me with an experience I will never forget. The Japan of reality is surprisingly not like the one portrayed in my imagination – in fact it’s far weirder. But for those first few hours in Tokyo, as the day began to dim and One Night in Tokyo slowly dissipated from my speakers, my fantasy vision of Japan was alive and well.

Click here for previous Sounds of Travel