Southwest grounds 41 Jets for “Safety related” issues.

Remember the hubbub last week about Southwest Airlines purportedly flying airplanes sans proper safety inspections? Well the problem wasn’t as bad as most media outlets (and politicians) made it sound, but most people agree that there was a bit of an oversight in the testing methods.

Once the airline routed out the bad apples (three employees were put on leave) and hired outside consultants to review their safety measures, they started going back to their maintenance records and inspecting their planes. In the course of their investigation, they determined that 44 of their 188 aircraft needed to be analyzed, five of which were already out for maintenance and one of which was already retired.

Before you flip out, Congressman Oberstar, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the 38 in the skies were going to burst into flames somewhere over Oklahoma, just that a small section of fuselage skin hadn’t recently been checked for flaws. None of the aircraft so far have been found unfit to fly, and Southwest expects to have all aircraft operational by tonight. Until then, you can expect a few flights to be out of schedule, but by the time you read this the inspections will probably already be done.

You can read an article, complete with incorrect data from CBS11 TV, or check out the Newswire post below.

FAA fines Southwest Airlines over 10 million dollars for flying unsafe planes

In the wake of the recent news that Southwest Airlines (WN) was caught flying planes past their security checks, the FAA just slapped the airline with a ten million dollar fine.

The issue stems with an error in safety checking a section of the aircraft fuselage; several of the redundant checks missed a section of the skin, thus creating the potential for one to miss finding a crack. Mind you, there were no faults in the aircraft skin found and all aircraft are still safe. Don’t put your tickets on Ebay yet.

That error in and of itself is a pretty big deal, but its mendable. Where the crap really hits the fan is where we find that several (select) FAA and Southwest officials knew about the oversight and didn’t do anything about it. Before it was a mistake — now its criminal.

Congress, in their overreacting state of things is calling a hearing to get to the bottom of the issue. One Mr. James Oberstar went so far as to call it “one of the worst safety violations” that he has ever seen. I’d personally like to find out what those (select) schemers over at WN and the FAA were up to when they didn’t mention the error.

Southwest Airlines allowed to fly ‘unsafe’ planes for months

CNN is reporting today on the findings of an ongoing investigation into the safety of Southwest Airlines planes flown as recently as last March.

“Documents submitted by FAA inspectors to congressional investigators allege the airline flew at least 117 of its planes in violation of mandatory safety checks. In some cases, the documents say, the planes flew for 30 months past government inspection deadlines that should have grounded the planes until the inspections could be completed.”

The report goes on to mention that several planes were “not air worthy,” and the FAA “knew the planes were flying ‘unsafely’ and did nothing about it.” Yikes.

Southwest has declined to comment. Read a comment from Southwest Airlines PR manager Paula Berg here.

%Gallery-7858%

Southwest comments on the removal of unruly women from their flight

Over the past few Southwest Airlines stories we’ve gotten to know Southwest PR department pretty well, and I recently had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of Paula Berg.

I asked her about the purported fiasco that’s unfolding around another round of women being booted from her airline’s flights and she had the following to say:

“Okay, Grant – Here are the facts…on Flight: #3144 from San Diego to Las Vegas on Jan. 31, 2008, two female passengers were being extremely loud and obnoxious from the moment they stepped on the aircraft. The two Customers were yelling for service from the Flight Attendants while they were in the midst of taking drink orders, and flipping people off. For that reason, our Flight Attendants refused to potentially escalate the situation by serving the girls alcohol. The girls then identified themselves as “TSA Employees,” told one of our Flight Attendants that she “would be taken care of,” and continued to harass our Flight Attendants and Customers throughout the flight. As a precautionary measure, our Flight Crew decided to have law enforcement meet the flight upon its arrival in Las Vegas.

Those are the facts, but I think it is important to point out that, there are rules for flying on any airline. And, when in doubt, the “Golden Rule” is a good place to start.

Just consider for a moment, if someone came into your office or place of business and started yelling, cursing, and flipping your customers off…you’d probably do one of three things 1) ask them to stop, 2) ask them to leave, 3) or call the cops. Unfortunately, when you’re at 35,000 feet, you can ask the Customer to stop, but you don’t have the luxury of simply asking the Customer to leave.

When a Customer makes it clear to that they are unable or unwilling to show the most basic levels of respect for the comfort and safety of the other 135 passengers onboard, we have to do something. Our Employees have an obligation to protect our Customers, and we have an obligation to ensure a safe work environment for our Employees.

Some may question the decision of our Crew, but ask yourself this…”When was the last time you were escorted off a plane by law enforcement,” and “how many times have you witnessed someone being escorted off a plane?” The truth is these are rare occurrences.

Anyone that has flown on us knows that we typically have a very fun, relaxed, and enjoyable environment onboard our aircraft. But when someone threatens our Customers or our Crews, we have to draw the line.

We have +34,000 Employees that work hard everyday to make this a great airline. Obviously, we’re not perfect. We make mistakes. And, with 100 million passengers flying with us each year, not everyone is going to have a perfect travel experience. When we do something wrong, we try to fix it, proactively in many cases. But, we do not believe this is one of those cases.

If these two Customers truly have an issue with how the situation played out onboard, I would ask them to contact our Customer Relations Department. We have a team of Customer Relations Employees on hand that are dedicated to assisting our Customers (I know, because I started my airline career in that department seven years ago).”

We’d like to thank Paula for all of her attentive work and attention she’s given us at Gadling. The facts, straight from the airline, always help straighten issues out when it comes to fiascoes like this.

Read the original article here.

Two more young women claim mistreatment on Southwest

I officially feel bad for Southwest Airlines. In the wake of the internet ruckus when two young women flying from Florida to California got booted off a round trip flight for what they say was “being too pretty”, another two women from San Diego have spoken up and cried foul.

The sisters say that they were “unfairly treated and humiliated” on a flight between San Diego and Las Vegas, during which they were apparently “obnoxious and annoying,” according to the SW incident report. During one of the confrontations after a flight attendant refused the option to serve them alcohol, one of them allegedly claimed “I work for the TSA and you will be taken care of.” The women deny this.

In either a retaliatory or precautionary measure, the women were escorted off the flight upon arrival, after which they were questioned for a couple of hours and released.

What I find most interesting is that they’ve stayed mum about this entire affair and hadn’t even contacted customer service until a few days ago. I think that after the too-pretty-to-fly incident, they decided that it was their turn for the spotlight.

Apparently they’re currently investigating legal action.

Check out Southwest Airline’s official blog: Nuts About Southwest.

Update: Southwest comments on the fiasco.


Damsels in da Skies: which one is raunchiest?



Click to read their stories, and vote below!

%Poll-10758%