So long, Maxjet

Well, it was fun while it lasted, wasn’t it, Maxjet?

This Christmas Eve, Maxjet, the budget airline flying among New York, London, Las Vegas and Los Angeles, filed for bankruptcy, ending a tumultuous four year journey through the uncharted realm of business-class-only jets.

It was a great idea, offering a low cost alternative to canonical first and business class tickets, but finding traction in a notoriously fickle and petty market is difficult — even without atrocious oil prices. Maxjet’s unfortunate entry into the airline world at this critical time proved to be a death sentence for their company. It’s too bad, I would have liked to fly business class on them some day.

Farewell Maxjet. I hope you gave all of your employees huge Christmas bonuses before you shut your doors.

Regulating the Internet in the skies

If you’ve been following technology in the airline sector for the past few months, you’ve probably heard that a number of airlines are getting ready to integrate wireless internet into their fleets. Earlier this month, Jetblue launched service (albeit limited) in one of their jets, and Virgin America, American Airlines and others have similar plans for the first quarters of next year.

With added flexibility in the skies, however, comes a higher probability of abuse. Earlier in a discussion about cell phone usage in the sky I pointed out that with wireless internet will come the ability to Skype and VOIP from above. In such close confines, both internet phone calls and browsing create tons of privacy and etiquette issues. Is it possible for a businessperson to sit between two people and jabber about confidential company information at top volume? Sure. Is it ethical? Probably not. What about the kid looking at graphic internet content while sitting next to a family in the back of the plane?

To curb some of these issues, airlines are taking a variety of defensive steps. Some, like Qantas, are blocking questionable sites completely so that they can’t be visited from above. Others have chosen to let the populous govern itself, pointing out that they can’t control the magazines or books that people bring on the planes either. I like this idea a lot, but when I think about all of the numbskulls out there, I don’t think it will end up working. Maybe we’ll get lucky.

Me? I just want to check my gmail and get my reading done. I’m looking forward to the wifi, even if it is regulated.

“We need YOU to land this plane!”

We’ve all seen a variation of the same scene in movies or on television: an airplane is cruising along at 30,000 feet when, suddenly, the pilot is put out of commission- either due to terrorists, a heart attack, or, most often, snakes. Suddenly, a flight attendant or passenger is called upon to land the plane, aided by the patient voice of someone in a control tower. “See that red lever?” they’ll say. “Let it up gently.” Usually, the de facto pilot has nerves of steel and manages to make a safe, albeit bumpy, landing.

Because movies and television are always completely faithful to reality, and they never exaggerate for dramatic effect, it may seem as if this scene could actually happen in real life. Not so, says Patrick Smith in his newest “Ask the Pilot” column. If there’s a certified pilot sitting next to you, telling you just what to do and when, you might have some fighting chance, says Smith. But in any other circumstances, your future is a little more bleak:

“The chance of success: approximately zero percent. I reckon [you] would be highly fortunate just to locate a microphone switch and figure out how to communicate. Keeping the plane upright would in some ways be the easiest part. It’s the small stuff that presents the greatest challenge: working the radios, dialing in changes to the FMS (flight management system) and autoflight panels, changing speeds and altitudes. Dictating such tasks from afar would be difficult enough. For the hapless passenger pressed into duty, getting them right would be even more challenging.”

Take a look at what you’re up against here.

First flight to Antarctica

Antarctica is one of the most difficult places on this planet to visit for the simple reason that planes do not fly there.

Well, that was the truth until last week when the first ever airline touched down on the frozen Arctic surface just four hours after leaving Australia. A beautiful video capturing the historic occasion can be seen here.

So what does this mean for tourism?

Not much, unfortunately. Currently the flights are only used to ferry scientists and gear to the Casey research station. The problem with allowing tourists to tag along is that there is nowhere for them to stay. The Antarctic Treaty would prohibit the building of resorts and hotels. Furthermore, the mere presence of tourists in such an environmentally sensitive area would require studies to measure the impact and the results just might reveal that the Antarctic cannot sustain too many overweight gawkers sporting Gortex and earmuffs.

Thieves at 30,000 feet

There is a certain sense of security and safety within the confines of an airplane.

Unlike a bus or train, most of us are completely at ease placing our carry-on out of sight and then closing our eyes and falling asleep. What thief would be brazen enough–or simply stupid enough–to try and steal someone’s luggage without any possible escape route?

Well, apparently thieves in China are taking advantage of this in-flight, lowering-of-one’s-guard and have been quite busy relieving passengers of their overhead-bin valuables while they sit just a few feet away merrily thumbing through their in-flight magazine.

In fact, the China Daily claims that there have been at least 100 thefts at 30,000 feet this year and that this has become so much of a problem that the Chinese government recently issued a nationwide warning to all passengers flying the unfriendly skies of China.

Oh man. The day Chinese airlines become just like Chinese trains is the day I stop flying in China.