Cockpit Chronicles: A view from the office window

There’s a bit of strategy involved with being a pilot on reserve. At least that’s the case at our company. On any given day there may be 4 our 5 reserve pilots qualified at the base to fly a particular airplane and division (domestic or international, for example.) If another pilot calls in sick or if there’s an unassigned trip the next day, crew scheduling will assign a trip to the most junior pilot first, unless that pilot has more flight time for the month than the other pilots on reserve. If everyone is equal, a senior pilot may either choose to fly a trip or pass it along to the next pilot.

Why would someone choose to go to work when they don’t have to?

They might want to take a two day trip tomorrow instead of a four-day trip the day after. Or they may prefer the destination or even the pilot they’d be flying with. I usually try to hold out for an interesting destination if I can.

However, due to a lack of pilots on the reserve list, more often than not you won’t have any choice when crew scheduling calls. We may be short of pilots, but at least my airline hasn’t resorted to using this kind of tactic to fill a trip. Camille or Myra will usually call the night before to let you know that you’ll be flying a trip the next day. That was the case last weekend when they ran out of reserve pilots domestically and needed someone to fly a two-day trip to Los Angeles.
I wondered what I’d do in L.A. for 24 hours. I looked up who the captain was and I was thrilled to see it was Bill, an exceptional pilot, who I always enjoyed flying with. It seems like half of my domestic trips are with Captain Bill. We tend to talk about airplanes for most of the flight. Not Boeing products, mind you, but small planes or as some like to say, “real flying.”

You might be surprised to learn that most pilots don’t fly small planes anymore. Some like to say that they can’t imagine doing any flying after coming home from work, and others just don’t feel they can afford it. I’m rapidly slipping into the latter category. Having grown up around ‘little’ airplanes, I could never imagine giving up flying them completely, but now that I have a family and home, it’s hard to find any extra money to pay for $5 a gallon fuel.

Bill has it figured out though. He avoids flying larger cross country airplanes such as a Beechcraft or Cessna, and sticks with the low and slow variety. Airplanes that give you the most “fun per dollar” as I like to say. He lives on a lake in Massachusetts and flies a light sport airplane he calls his contraption out of his back yard. It’s an amphibious biplane that looks like a blast to fly. I’m sure most other pilots think he’s crazy, but once you’ve flown this kind of airplane with fantastic visibility and the ability to splash down almost anywhere you just can’t give it up. And he’s burning car gas at the rate of about 4 gallons an hour. That’s $14 an hour to operate not including any maintenance.

About the only time I’m able to fly small planes has been when I go fly a friend’s or a relative’s airplane, like we did on a San Francisco layover in December, or my brother Kurt let’s me borrow one of his airplanes. Kurt moved 1000 miles away to Michigan, so this isn’t very easy anymore. There’s always that elusive captain upgrade, when I hope to buy this. If I can just convince my wife, of course.

The flight out to L.A. gave me a chance to get a few scenic pictures. I enjoy the view down below and we don’t get as much to look at when we’re flying international trips over the Atlantic or Caribbean sea. I snapped some pictures over the Rockies and just east of Las Vegas I took a few pictures of Lake Mead, which researchers are saying could dry up in fifteen years. At least it will make it easy to get to this airplane that’s at the bottom of the lake. I’d love to get a closer view of this extraordinary area of the country someday.

We flew over the Big Bear ski resort and Red Rock Canyon just west of Las Vegas which looked great. These gallery pictures below are best viewed large. Click on any of them to get the full view.

%Gallery-18959%

The arrival into LAX was uneventful. Bill was nice enough to give me the Westbound leg. It was a kind gesture since we were flying a 767 there and a 757 back. I owe him one. As I’ve mentioned on my last 767 trip, it’s a nice treat to fly the larger airplane.

So what big plans did I come up with for the long Los Angeles layover? Lots of sleep, a burrito for lunch at Chipotle and dinner with Bill at a Japanese place. An exciting layover for us! But I just can’t pass up those fresh Chipotle burritos and the WiFi in the hotel kept me occupied. It’s so tough to get anything done at home with kids in the house, so I often get my blogging done on a layover–this time finishing the training story from last week.

Surprisingly, I haven’t had any excessive delays since I started writing about my trips 15 months ago. With all the stories in the press of late flights and stranded passengers, you would think I’d seen more of this. My luck ran out on Saturday though. Our airplane that we were taking to Boston was about an hour late arriving at LAX. As it landed, it flew through some heavy construction dust that was blowing across the runway. Enough in fact, for the mechanics to decide the engines needed a borescope inspection. Since that would take our airplane out of service for the day, we had to wait a few hours for another airplane to arrive. After a 5 hour delay, we landed in Boston at 2:30 in the morning. Because I slept 12 hours on this layover I wasn’t feeling the least bit tired.

Thanks for all the comments and the great response. We’re going to start a weekly feature called “Plane Answers” in a few days. Anything you’re curious about, feel free to email me. If I don’t know the answer, I’ll surely find someone who does.

I’ll leave you with this video showing more of the view from this office window taken over the past year.



Cockpit Chronicles takes you along on each of Kent’s trips as a co-pilot on the Boeing 757 and 767 out of Boston.

TSA’s ‘Black Diamond’ program is spreading, debuts in Boston tomorrow

Last month, Aaron brought us news of the Transportation Security Administration’s so-called Black Diamond program, aimed at making the security process at airports a bit more enjoyable.

While there is probably no initiative in this world that could truly accomplish that goal, it seems like Black Diamond is catching on. It debuted at Salt Lake City International last month. Then it turned up at Denver International. Now the TSA is going to begin testing it tomorrow at Boston’s Logan International Airport, a place where lines go to grow.

A quick recap: Black Diamond applies the basic delineations of ski trails to security lines, with the green line for travel newbies, the intermediate line for more frequent travelers and the black diamond line for “travel experts,” whoever those are. The thinking is that if people correctly choose the appropriate line, the entire security process will go quicker.

Am I the only one who wonders how this could ever really work? I mean, perhaps there’s something to it if it continues to pop up at other airports, as the TSA promises. But I’m skeptical. Sure, it’s catchy, but it appears to outright ignore one of the first principles of travel, if not to say human nature: We will always seek out the shorter line.

So, picture the blue line bogged down with some less experienced travelers, fumbling for their belts or whatever. Meanwhile that black line is wide open, the savvy travel pros flying through. Who isn’t going to ditch the blue line and jump to that shorter line to get through quicker? I sure would. Hell, people will probably try to ditch the green line if it’s moving at a crawl.

Who really is a travel expert, anyway? And “multiple carry-ons”? Don’t airlines limit those anyway?

The ski analogy is easy to comprehend. But those of us who are skiers have all been confronted with the novice skier who inexplicably winds up on the wrong trail. Just as there’s no one to stop that from happening on the mountain, there’s really no way to control that in airports.

What does everyone else think?

Airlines give a thumbs down to new fingerprinting plan

Airlines are voicing their disapproval about a new plan that would require international passengers departing the U.S. to be fingerprinted before they leave.

While Congress recently approved the fingerprinting measure, the airlines are urging the White House to kill the plan, saying that fingerprinting every international passenger as they depart would further stall the boarding process.

Government officials recently stated that fingerprinting one foreign traveler “would take about a minute,” which, multiplied by hundreds of passengers per flight, would slow the departure process considerably.

“If you think the travel process is bad now, just wait,” said the head of the International Air Transport Association.

The fingerprinting plan is another move by the Department of Homeland Security to keep track of– what else?– terrorists. Recommended by the panel that investigated the 9-11 attacks, the idea has been roundly criticized by the airlines, privacy groups, foreign governments, and members of Congress.

Man in wheelchair steals airport shuttle; drives around in circles; disappears into thin air

I guess you just don’t suspect the guy in the wheelchair to carjack your hotel shuttle, but that’s exactly what happened early yesterday morning at San Francisco International Airport.

CBS 5 out of the bay area is reporting that while a hotel employee was out of the vehicle unloading luggage, a man in a wheelchair pulled up, jumped out and into the driver seat then started driving around the airport. He then chose not to drive away from the airport, but rather around it two times before apparently getting bored and abandoning it.

Four passengers, who must have been scared witless, were privy to the joy ride. I can’t imagine what they were thinking during the fiasco.

The man then proceeded to completely vanish, for as CBS 5 reports, airport officials have yet to apprehend a subject.

No word on whether the event had anything to do with St. Patrick’s Day.

%Gallery-7858%

Airports get their own theme songs

More and more airports are (trying to become) destinations in themselves, and as such, airport branding is emerging as a tactic for getting travelers to choose one airport or city over another. We wrote about celebrities making announcements at various airports, but here’s a new one: theme songs.

Although I don’t really think that ‘theme song” is the best designation for this activity (“advertising ditty” seems more appropriate), it’s hard to deny that once you get a jingle stuck in your head, it’s hard to get it out. That’s why, years later, I can still sing commercial songs like “Who likes Trident? I do I do,” and “Plop plop fizz fizz, oh what a relief it is!” Although airports aren’t likely to freshen your breath or help with indigestion, they do hope to create an experience memorable enough that the next time you’re buying your tickets, you pick theirs for a layover or destination.

The Hunstville, Texas airport got a theme song in the hopes that it will help convince travelers to choose it over Nashville or Birmingham, Alabama. And LAX took an older (sadder) song and changed its tune to be perky and fun. Southwest Airlines handed out CDs of the song to all of its incoming L.A. passengers in 2003. I even found one for the Hyderabad, India airport.